[sudo-discuss] [sudo-announce] REQUEST FOR COMMENT: proposed changes to the Articles of Association!

Anthony Di Franco di.franco at gmail.com
Thu Mar 14 15:22:01 PDT 2013


I agree completely.
On Mar 14, 2013 3:09 PM, "Julio Rios" <julio.rios at gmail.com> wrote:

> Can we just vote on the proposal as is and treat improvements as a
> separate proposal?  I don't think anyone has serious objections to the
> current text, but it isn't perfect; nothing will be perfect.  Wouldn't it
> be better to have this implemented than to continue to delay the process?
>
> I would encourage continued discussion, but conclusions from that should
> be a separate proposal, if only to simplify what we're trying to accomplish
> with this process.  Do you guys disagree?
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Anthony Di Franco <di.franco at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Please don't edit that draft directly; rather discuss changes on the list
>> or create a child article from the draft to make your changes on so it is
>> clear whose changes are whose.
>>  On Mar 14, 2013 12:26 PM, "Eddan Katz" <eddan at clear.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On what draft should we make edits and/or comments? Or should these be
>>> discussed on this list in this thread?
>>>
>>>
>>> sent from eddan.com
>>>
>>> On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Yardena Cohen <yardenack at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > We are trying to revise our Articles of Association! Because we try to
>>> > do this consensually, we bring changes both AT the meetings, and ON
>>> > the mailing lists, as per the existing articles here:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Articles_of_Association#Section_4.1_Process
>>> >
>>> > At the March 13th meeting, we had a straw poll in on THESE changes:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://sudoroom.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Articles_of_Association%2FConstable&diff=2980&oldid=2635
>>> >
>>> > We voted unanimously in favor of these changes: 7 yes, 0 no, 11
>>> > abstaining. But that was only a straw poll. We are going to have a
>>> > REAL, BINDING vote on these changes at the March 20th meeting. If
>>> > there are no objections meanwhile from this mailing list, and if that
>>> > meeting also votes yes, then the OFFICIAL Sudoroom Articles of
>>> > Association will then look like this:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://sudoroom.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Articles_of_Association/Constable&oldid=2980
>>> >
>>> > The intervening week is your opportunity, internet peanut gallery, to
>>> > voice any objections, because we care about those not physically
>>> > present! Thank you so much for helping make Sudoroom awesome and
>>> > consensual. :)
>>> >
>>> > Yardena
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > sudo-discuss mailing list
>>> > sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>>> > http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-announce mailing list
> sudo-announce at lists.sudoroom.org
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-announce
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20130314/5f327a26/attachment.html>


More information about the sudo-discuss mailing list