[sudo-discuss] [omni-discuss] Elliot Hughes

[joseph liesner]

When I was corrected for calling Elliot my comrade I
thought well I don't know, yet, what happened with them
so sould I trust others (as I have been advised to in the past)
and no longer consider them a comrade.  It didn't feel right;
and I think that is why his banning feels so strange to me.
Then, finally, at post # 24 DK adds some important specifics.
So I am requesting that the Sudoroom meeting where Elliot' s
banning is discussed be announced on Discuss well in advance of
it's happening.
Tahnks 
joe
On Jan 15, 2015, at 11:44 AM, Eske Silver wrote:

> Sent this a couple days go, but I forgot to hit 'reply all':
> 
> True, though, that we have parted ways with members, and guests, for less than [multiple physical incidents?] - comrade or not. 
> While case-by-case is my prefered language, I also always stand by a Zero Tolerance for abuse toward another loving being.
> 
> From what I've read, this seems the logical mean answer:
> For the sake of Safer Spaces, let's ask that Elliot appreciate a request that they take leave, until we find a resolution...
> For the sake of nuance and case-by-case, I'd bet we could find someone who's known Elliot for a handful of human time increments, who would be so kind as to reach out to Elliot. This person might then glean what's going on with Elliot, and how he feels we (all) should/can procede with these issues.
> Then, for the sake of precident, if Elliot is willing and able, we can follow the guide and set on to conflict resolution...
> The rest is (in theory) easy, I'd say.
> 
> Any edits?
> 
> ~ Korl
> 
> ~ Korl
> 
> 500px.com/eske
> 510.689.4484
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150116/b690f40c/attachment.html>