[sudo-discuss] lighting options

Robert Benson sf99er at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 23:36:12 PST 2015


there is a transformer & there are 8 X 4 ft light strips w/10 leds/4ft
strip. label say:Trintiy Mfg LLC P/N 401415 24vdc/.55a(13.3w) 6000k 2B-R2.

i tied 4 strips together onto a 1x2 board to form the relative dimensions
of the flouries & was told "it's bright", "it's a different kinda light",
"it's about 1/3 as bright" & "it's about 1/2"

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:40 PM, <sudo-discuss-request at lists.sudoroom.org>
wrote:

>  [image: Boxbe] <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> This message is eligible
> for Automatic Cleanup! (sudo-discuss-request at lists.sudoroom.org) Add
> cleanup rule
> <https://www.boxbe.com/popup?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.boxbe.com%2Fcleanup%3Ftoken%3D1%252BIyQvNGFzzsON%252BliKIfGj%252Fq60fB%252BnVMO8hQzplDiQeTptoLwXeX1x7LiVKWMe9cqFiDejbLoum%252BnzAIoXM5TDmVMUtnnd8MGXgm4a%252Bw%252F4ttAe3M%252BU6ve01xyVyFL8QPsyKr5QfVO6bt%252F81hXnu1wuraFhZq%252BV1OdXoJ22WjoRM%253D%26key%3DvxMVFRWk%252Bp0Mepvx7gTJpRliSZzLC%252B2qyZkq9sUrHSM%253D&tc_serial=20492455200&tc_rand=862968574&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD&utm_content=001>
> | More info
> <http://blog.boxbe.com/general/boxbe-automatic-cleanup?tc_serial=20492455200&tc_rand=862968574&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD&utm_content=001>
>
> Send sudo-discuss mailing list submissions to
>         sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         sudo-discuss-request at lists.sudoroom.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         sudo-discuss-owner at lists.sudoroom.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of sudo-discuss digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. sudo at maker faire (Jake)
>    2. Re: sudo at maker faire (Gregg Horton)
>    3. Re: sudo at maker faire (Patrik D'haeseleer)
>    4. Self-replicating Caffeine (Marc Juul)
>    5. important tax information (Marc Juul)
>    6. Re: Omni invoices - Reminder (Jenny Ryan)
>    7. Re: important tax information (Ira Brightman)
>    8. Test email (check out receipt of emails) (Ira Brightman)
>    9. wiki admin? (Candace Lazarou)
>   10. Re: Omni invoices - Reminder (Sarah Pritchard)
>   11. Re: wiki admin? (Jenny Ryan)
>   12. Paid Web Job - Do we have a job list? Here are the        deets
>       (Liberty Madison)
>   13. Re: lighting options (Alice Rosenthal)
>   14. Re: lighting options (Jake)
>   15. Scents and Non-Scents (Ira Brightman)
>   16. Re: lighting options (Glenn Meader)
>   17. Re: lighting options (Patrik D'haeseleer)
>   18. Re: lighting options (Cere Misc)
>   19. Re: lighting options (Jake)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 14:09:05 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jake <jake at spaz.org>
> To: sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> Subject: [sudo-discuss] sudo at maker faire
> Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1502161407000.62936 at pe2950.spaz.org>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
>
> is sudoroom going to have a presence at Maker Faire?  It means a bunch of
> people can get in free.  All we need is a table and some interesting
> things to put on it, and people to sign up for shifts to guard the table.
>
> also i think it could be a good opportunity to attract excellent hackers
> to our space.
>
> no we cannot bring the robot.  it's too big and delicate and they would
> never allow us to turn it on without a cage around it.
>
> -jake
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 14:11:56 -0800
> From: Gregg Horton <greggahorton at gmail.com>
> To: sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> Subject: Re: [sudo-discuss] sudo at maker faire
> Message-ID: <54E26B2C.7050705 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
> If sudo goes can we bring DARPA approved t-shirts and outerwear
>
> Maybe we can steal a Drone
>
>
> On 2/16/15 2:09 PM, Jake wrote:
> > is sudoroom going to have a presence at Maker Faire? It means a bunch
> > of people can get in free.  All we need is a table and some
> > interesting things to put on it, and people to sign up for shifts to
> > guard the table.
> >
> > also i think it could be a good opportunity to attract excellent
> > hackers to our space.
> >
> > no we cannot bring the robot.  it's too big and delicate and they
> > would never allow us to turn it on without a cage around it.
> >
> > -jake
> > _______________________________________________
> > sudo-discuss mailing list
> > sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> > https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 14:57:46 -0800
> From: "Patrik D'haeseleer" <patrikd at gmail.com>
> To: Jake <jake at spaz.org>
> Cc: sudo-discuss <sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: Re: [sudo-discuss] sudo at maker faire
> Message-ID:
>         <CAKOjizM+Nw6usbLXYMuT-ga8tUBH+xcRUwehOQU1=
> 8kimGiR-A at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I just signed up for a combined Bay Area Biohackers booth as well, with
> CCL, BioCurious, plus whomever else wants to join us. If Sudo wants to have
> a booth as well, you can ask to be located near us.
>
> Patrik
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
>
> > is sudoroom going to have a presence at Maker Faire?  It means a bunch of
> > people can get in free.  All we need is a table and some interesting
> things
> > to put on it, and people to sign up for shifts to guard the table.
> >
> > also i think it could be a good opportunity to attract excellent hackers
> > to our space.
> >
> > no we cannot bring the robot.  it's too big and delicate and they would
> > never allow us to turn it on without a cage around it.
> >
> > -jake
> > _______________________________________________
> > sudo-discuss mailing list
> > sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> > https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150216/27cc18b1/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 04:28:12 -0800
> From: Marc Juul <juul at labitat.dk>
> To: sudo-discuss <sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: [sudo-discuss] Self-replicating Caffeine
> Message-ID:
>         <CAL4ejvQAwkjQJR6KZ2_5hUjf2NLpiebNvEceh6UE_hCeH=
> Su0A at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Does anyone know where I can get a plant or seeds or cuttings of the ilex
> guayusa plant?
>
>   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilex_guayusa
>
> I'm already growing ilex paraguariensis at Omni but I'd like to have both
> plants. Why?
>
> Because they literally turn CO2 and dirt into caffeine. How are we not all
> doing this already?
>
> --
> marc/juul
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150217/7d656a0d/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:50:52 -0800
> From: Marc Juul <juul at labitat.dk>
> To: sudo-discuss <sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: [sudo-discuss] important tax information
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAL4ejvRLP1y7iUWv8yfdwZn-be7qvmbFL3ULsg_hqTX2wH_VyA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> It looks like the fiscal year for sudo room ends in November instead of
> December. I'm inducing this from scant information available but will try
> to verify with the IRS tomorrow (their phone lines are pretty jammed
> today). This means that, for the tax forms that we file the deadline is
> 15th of April instead of 15th of May. Again, I will try to verify this.
>
> It seems that Max Klein actually did file taxes before 15th of April last
> year, so we're good.
>
> --
> marc/juul
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150217/6660f0a0/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:49:57 -0800
> From: Jenny Ryan <tunabananas at gmail.com>
> To: Sarah Pritchard <sarahloupritchard at gmail.com>
> Cc: sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org, "finance at lists.omnicommons.org"
>         <finance at lists.omnicommons.org>
> Subject: Re: [sudo-discuss] Omni invoices - Reminder
> Message-ID: <54E50905.5040903 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi Sarah,
>
> Sudo has paid the second invoice for utilities and insurance for January.
>
> The first invoice is for insurance from January-July. Does this mean we
> need to pay 2x insurance for January?
>
> As we are not currently fiscally solvent and are dipping into our savings,
> we would prefer to pay monthly installments. $581.46/6 = $96.91/month. Let
> me know how we should reconcile January?
>
> Many thanks for all you do <3
> Jenny
>
> On 02/06/2015 02:04 PM, Sarah Pritchard wrote:
> > Hello Sudo-ers!
> > Just a reminder to please pay the remainder of your invoice for the
> Omni's
> > shared expenses in January ($86.47 outstanding) as soon as possible. See
> > attached for a copy of that invoice.
> >
> > As well, please let the finances working group know how you would like to
> > pay for the State Farm insurance the Omni paid on your behalf from
> January
> > - July 2015. Monthly installments is fine, just let us know how much you
> > plan to contribute each month. See the attached invoice for your
> reference.
> >
> > Let us know if you have any questions.
> >
> > Thanks and <3,
> > SP + Finances WG
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Jenny
> http://jennyryan.net
> http://sudomesh.org
> http://thevirtualcampfire.org
> http://technomadic.tumblr.com
>
> `~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
> "Technology is the campfire around which we tell our stories."
> -Laurie Anderson
>
> "Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining it."
> -Hannah Arendt
>
> "To define is to kill. To suggest is to create."
> -St?phane Mallarm?
> ~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:12:09 -0800
> From: Ira Brightman <ira997 at gmail.com>
> To: Marc Juul <juul at labitat.dk>
> Cc: sudo-discuss <sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: Re: [sudo-discuss] important tax information
> Message-ID:
>         <CA+H3qo=r8t46idroyQvps_tYCVPnsAz6f5Bhhi574JJckX=
> gwQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> This is a test email. If you have a yahoo email and see this only in the
> archives on the main Sudo site, check your spam folder. Many Sudo emails
> may be going into it.
>
> I will be sending another similar test email that is not a reply to see if
> it makes a difference.
>
> Ira
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Marc Juul <juul at labitat.dk> wrote:
>
> > It looks like the fiscal year for sudo room ends in November instead of
> > December. I'm inducing this from scant information available but will try
> > to verify with the IRS tomorrow (their phone lines are pretty jammed
> > today). This means that, for the tax forms that we file the deadline is
> > 15th of April instead of 15th of May. Again, I will try to verify this.
> >
> > It seems that Max Klein actually did file taxes before 15th of April last
> > year, so we're good.
> >
> > --
> > marc/juul
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sudo-discuss mailing list
> > sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> > https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150218/61ad7ae1/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:21:20 -0800
> From: Ira Brightman <ira997 at gmail.com>
> To: sudo-discuss <sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: [sudo-discuss] Test email (check out receipt of emails)
> Message-ID:
>         <CA+H3qo=2ULi1ZP=
> 6mJcC0UYsqUpeqvRqVJThnjYRCpsXQ-adxw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi All,
>
> If you have a Yahoo email and see this only in the Sudo room archive, this
> and many other Sudo-discuss emails are likely going into your spam folder.
>
> Have a funny day.
> Best,
> Ira Brightman (The Life-Extension Comedian)
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150218/56a87560/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:44:42 -0800
> From: Candace Lazarou <candacelazarou at gmail.com>
> To: sudo-discuss <sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: [sudo-discuss] wiki admin?
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAMrGyrmWxcuPxYX-1sNVVP9oQBaSKM+hOvJZrLuVrVn3nK7_OQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Who is admin-ing the wiki?  My membership has been pending for a while now,
> and I'd like to update some info on javascript night.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150218/dd481153/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:48:59 -0800
> From: Sarah Pritchard <sarahloupritchard at gmail.com>
> To: Jenny Ryan <tunabananas at gmail.com>
> Cc: sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org, "finance at lists.omnicommons.org"
>         <finance at lists.omnicommons.org>
> Subject: Re: [sudo-discuss] Omni invoices - Reminder
> Message-ID:
>         <CAJw8shnbaFEpBzj6pXcEvonAuR3t3MX+UoiGEZZJ=
> z+G8Xyykw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hey Jenny,
> Thanks for the update.
>
> To clarify, the invoice for insurance is for Sudo Room's policy with State
> Farm (not the Omni's general insurance). Our lease states that each member
> collective must hold its own insurance policy, and if any of the member
> collectives default on their insurance, John Givens can fine the Omni a
> percentage of the rent. After a few mishaps with member collectives'
> insurance policies lapsing, the finances working group decided to pay all
> of the individual collectives' policies through July.
>
> The Omni is also required to hold general liability insurance and
> director's and officer's insurance, and John Givens invoices us monthly for
> the building insurance policy he holds. We pay for each of these policies
> monthly and collectives share the expense. So, you will continue to see
> insurance as a line item on your monthly shared expense bill for the Omni's
> general insurance expenses.
>
> I can create a new invoice for Sudo Room's State Farm policy reflecting the
> monthly payment schedule.
>
> Let me know if you have any questions in the meantime.
>
> Thanks so much,
> Sarah
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Jenny Ryan <tunabananas at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sarah,
> >
> > Sudo has paid the second invoice for utilities and insurance for January.
> >
> > The first invoice is for insurance from January-July. Does this mean we
> > need to pay 2x insurance for January?
> >
> > As we are not currently fiscally solvent and are dipping into our
> savings,
> > we would prefer to pay monthly installments. $581.46/6 = $96.91/month.
> Let
> > me know how we should reconcile January?
> >
> > Many thanks for all you do <3
> > Jenny
> >
> > On 02/06/2015 02:04 PM, Sarah Pritchard wrote:
> > > Hello Sudo-ers!
> > > Just a reminder to please pay the remainder of your invoice for the
> > Omni's
> > > shared expenses in January ($86.47 outstanding) as soon as possible.
> See
> > > attached for a copy of that invoice.
> > >
> > > As well, please let the finances working group know how you would like
> to
> > > pay for the State Farm insurance the Omni paid on your behalf from
> > January
> > > - July 2015. Monthly installments is fine, just let us know how much
> you
> > > plan to contribute each month. See the attached invoice for your
> > reference.
> > >
> > > Let us know if you have any questions.
> > >
> > > Thanks and <3,
> > > SP + Finances WG
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Jenny
> > http://jennyryan.net
> > http://sudomesh.org
> > http://thevirtualcampfire.org
> > http://technomadic.tumblr.com
> >
> > `~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
> > "Technology is the campfire around which we tell our stories."
> > -Laurie Anderson
> >
> > "Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining
> it."
> > -Hannah Arendt
> >
> > "To define is to kill. To suggest is to create."
> > -St?phane Mallarm?
> > ~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150218/be9fb07a/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:56:29 -0800
> From: Jenny Ryan <tunabananas at gmail.com>
> To: Candace Lazarou <candacelazarou at gmail.com>
> Cc: sudo-discuss <sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: Re: [sudo-discuss] wiki admin?
> Message-ID: <54E534BD.3020507 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On 02/18/2015 04:44 PM, Candace Lazarou wrote:
> > Who is admin-ing the wiki?  My membership has been pending for a while
> now,
> > and I'd like to update some info on javascript night.
> Sorry about that, Candace! You are now approved :) Rock on!
>
> --
>
> Jenny
> http://jennyryan.net
> http://sudomesh.org
> http://thevirtualcampfire.org
> http://technomadic.tumblr.com
>
> `~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
> "Technology is the campfire around which we tell our stories."
> -Laurie Anderson
>
> "Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining it."
> -Hannah Arendt
>
> "To define is to kill. To suggest is to create."
> -St?phane Mallarm?
> ~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:46:46 -0800
> From: Liberty Madison <libertymadison at gmail.com>
> To: Sudo room <sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: [sudo-discuss] Paid Web Job - Do we have a job list? Here are
>         the     deets
> Message-ID:
>         <CACyj8k+54PnrFDh=nZZkWSb=G6jxmQj4KEdFcdhiyQ+=
> Ep4N-g at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> A woman is Looking for tech help ASAP
> Do we have a job list?
>
> She focuses on neuroscience and spiritual healing
> Her main concern for her website is functionality.
>
>
> A. Scheduler- Main Pain Point
> She is having an issue with people scheduling appointment. I advised her to
> ditch the "form" and go with in interactive live e scheduler where as
> clients can see what she has open and she can block off dates she does not
> want to work. (very simple to integrate)
>
> B. EBlast
> Her eblast needs to be integrated with her email list at mailchimp.
>
> C. Landing Page
> She has a new sector/product within her site "Redesigning Shame" that needs
> a distinct landing page.
>
> This is a paid job with a budget
>
> What she needs can truly be done in 2-3 days if that.
> Ideal person is skilled in Front/Backend
>
> Any interest?
>
> Liberty
> @libertymadison
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150218/94d35bc5/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:58:59 -0800
> From: Alice Rosenthal <beehappysolutions at gmail.com>
> To: Cere Misc <cere.misc at gmail.com>
> Cc: Jake <jake at spaz.org>, "Dana S." <dsniezko at sonic.net>, sudo-discuss
>         <sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: Re: [sudo-discuss] lighting options
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAEQ42J8+11Uj07bmFBxdE73cWX_xCbDfZyn_6z5aWYL7UPxc_w at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not really in this discussion but I thought I should chime in. There
> was some discussion on lighting earlier and creating an atmosphere.
>
> The other day I brought to Sudo Room a fully functional "EZ up" that has no
> fabric canopy.  I thought if it was set up over the work tables that it
> could be used as a structure for which to attach lights (temporarily) to
> test out some ideas.
>
> One person thought that it was an interesting idea - another person said it
> would take up too much room.  I responded by saying that it would only take
> up 4 square inches since that is the foot print of each 1 in leg -
> otherwise it is a square grid in the air.
>
> Light can be clamped onto the grid or mounted by screws.  If using the
> frame is not desirable then the metal can be hacked, used for the robot or
> scrapped.  It could even be used at the maker faire.
>
> Alice
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Cere Misc <cere.misc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There is something missing this the specs of that lighting.  It is not
> > warm at all.  I don't think it's fair (or appreciated) to oversimplify
> the
> > need for warm lighting as "mood" lighting.  The "color" of the lighting
> has
> > nothing to do with light intensity values and it's easy to spot when you
> > see it.  The eyes are much more sensitive than instruments when it comes
> to
> > these supposed specifications of "warmth".
> >
> > If you go to a lighting store you can just see what they look like and
> buy
> > accordingly.  Maybe Ikea or Home Depot have a light viewing section so we
> > can just see for ourselves.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Patrik D'haeseleer <patrikd at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The one in the lab room is 4000K, with a Color Rendering Index of 82.
> >> That is "warmer" than fluorescents (and zero flicker!), and much warmer
> >> than a daylight bulb. Good for doing detailed work - which is exactly
> what
> >> we need there - and acceptable for working with colors.
> >>
> >> If we want mood lighting, we should get mood lighting. If we want lights
> >> to do soldering or other precision work, 4000K is great. Heck get both,
> so
> >> people can pick and choose what they need at any time. Plus a few
> >5000K,
> >> >90CRI daylight bulbs for people doing artwork.
> >>
> >> Patrik
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Cere Misc <cere.misc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> As another point of reference for the lights that Patrik got for the
> lab
> >>> room.  They are ugly cold sanitarium colored lights.  Please lets NOT
> get
> >>> more of those!
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Patrik D'haeseleer <
> patrikd at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> As another point of comparison, the LED light fixture I put in the CCL
> >>>> lab room is this one:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> http://www.homedepot.com/p/Lithonia-Lighting-2-ft-x-4-ft-White-LED-Prismatic-Lens-Troffer-2GTL4/203820958?N=5yc1vZc7buZ1z115g2
> >>>>
> >>>> It's a 4000 Lumens, 45 Watt fixture made to resemble a fluorescent
> tube
> >>>> one. Internally, it has four 36-LED strips behind a nice diffuser,
> and a
> >>>> big-ass 30VDC/1.58A LED driver. (In comparison, that first bulb Jake
> posted
> >>>> is 800 Lumen, so this one is equivalent in light output to about five
> of
> >>>> those)
> >>>>
> >>>> These sell for $119 at Home Depot, which is of course far too much.
> >>>> Should be easy to reverse engineer these for far less, but I'm not
> sure how
> >>>> well that would go over with our fire inspection, even if some of the
> >>>> chinese knockoffs may very well pose more of fire hazard...
> >>>>
> >>>> Patrik
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> so i guess sudoroom (and CCL too probably) need some new lights,
> since
> >>>>> the flourescents are failing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Home Despot sells 11-watt "warm white" bulbs for $9 each, which would
> >>>>> be a good idea if we had regular lamp sockets to screw bulbs into...
> >>>>> http://www.homedepot.com/p/Cree-60W-Equivalent-Daylight-
> >>>>> 5000K-A19-Dimmable-LED-Light-Bulb-with-4Flow-Filament-
> >>>>> Design-BA19-08050OMF-12DE26-3U100/205597079?N=5yc1vZbm79
> >>>>>
> >>>>> but china can always do better.  I looked on Ali Express and sorted
> by
> >>>>> customer satisfaction, looking for LED lighting in "downlights" which
> >>>>> suggests lamps shining downward?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> these look good but the seller rating is only 97.4%:
> >>>>> http://www.aliexpress.com/item/High-Quality-Aluminum-9W-
> >>>>> 15W-21W-27W-45W-LED-Downlight-Ceiling-lights-lamp-AC85-265V-
> >>>>> With/2027740342.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> they seem to be "16 to 21" watts for $6.95 including shipping.  They
> >>>>> offer "warm" and "cold" flavors so we could just get a mix of the two
> >>>>> kinds, for something in the middle when they're all on.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> here is the search i was doing:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.aliexpress.com/category/200002289/led-
> >>>>> downlights.html?site=glo&isrefine=y&shipCountry=US&
> >>>>> SortType=total_weight_score_desc
> >>>>>
> >>>>> this one is also a good price, and the seller rating is higher
> (98.1%)
> >>>>> http://www.aliexpress.com/item/21W-Antifogging-Epistar-
> >>>>> led-downlight-AC85-265V-Contains-the-drive-power-free-
> >>>>> shipping/2047334906.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ultimately i have higher confidence in the quality of something we
> buy
> >>>>> from Cree at Home Despot, but I think we should give China a chance
> and buy
> >>>>> a few of the "16 to 21 watt" ones and see how they compare.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For reference, Cree (a reputable company) and other LED bulbs sold at
> >>>>> Home Despot are called "60 watt replacement" bulbs while actually
> using 9
> >>>>> to 11 watts.  The light fixtures presently in Sudoroom and CCL each
> have
> >>>>> two 75-watt flourescent bulbs, for a total of 900 watts of light in
> the
> >>>>> bocce ball room when they're all working.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That suggests that 150 watts of LED lighting would be equivalent,
> >>>>> which would cost about $60 from the first aliexpress link i provided.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> These lights just have wires coming out, so we would perhaps attach
> >>>>> them onto the metal structures that are presently holding flourescent
> >>>>> lights for simplicity, until we come up with something better.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -jake
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
> >>>>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> >>>>> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
> >>>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> >>>> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sudo-discuss mailing list
> > sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> > https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Alice Rosenthal
> Bee Happy Solutions
> 1837 Prince St
> Berkeley, CA 94703
> 415-272-0596
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150219/189abb58/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:04:11 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jake <jake at spaz.org>
> To: sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> Subject: Re: [sudo-discuss] lighting options
> Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1502191001240.62936 at pe2950.spaz.org>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
>
> I  ordered eight 16-21watt  LED lights from china with the $55raised at
> the meeting last night
>
> i'll put them on the non functioning flourescent fixture above the sewing
> corner
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:59:21 -0800
> From: Ira Brightman <ira997 at gmail.com>
> To: sudo-discuss <sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: [sudo-discuss] Scents and Non-Scents
> Message-ID:
>         <CA+H3qomJc6EJck=HALK8RES31H=mi4dzwjmXx0bCns1=
> X9v6ng at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi All,
>
> As per last night's discussion at the meeting I would like to suggest the
> following:
>
> The Omni building be declared a scent-free workplace. There are many such
> offices, etc., especially in the Bay Area. This means anyone entering the
> building is required to refrain from using perfumes (except natural ones
> from a health food store), hairsprays, deodorants, scented makeup, etc.
>
> All cleaning products and the like should be free of scents (many very fine
> natural ones are available), paint or other building improvement products
> should be free of scents and chemicals if at all possible (there are paints
> that are chemical free and have no odor.)
>
> However, any member project producing an odor or unavoidable smoke or odor
> from a room improvement that can't be avoided, should be exempt from any
> restrictions. In such cases, the membership should be informed of such
> project's timeline, so affected members can avoid building use at such
> times.
>
> Have a funny day.
> Best,
> Ira Brightman (The Life-Extension Comedian)
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150219/e4fd2c53/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:48:25 -0800
> From: Glenn Meader <glenn at chromakinetics.com>
> To: Patrik D'haeseleer <patrikd at gmail.com>, Cere Misc
>         <cere.misc at gmail.com>
> Cc: Jake <jake at spaz.org>, "Dana S." <dsniezko at sonic.net>, sudo-discuss
>         <sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: Re: [sudo-discuss] lighting options
> Message-ID:
>         <1424393305.1772.YahooMailNeo at web181003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Cere probably is thinking of the warmth of standard incandescent lights
> with a color temp of 2700K.
> A light with 4000K color temperature is a cool white, good for detail
> work, not so nice for comfort...
> For more info on color temperature in lighting for the layman:
> http://www.topbulb.com/color-temperature/
> -- Glenn (theater lighting designer)
>
>
> On Monday, February 16, 2015 12:49 AM, Patrik D'haeseleer <
> patrikd at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> The one in the lab room is 4000K, with a Color Rendering Index of 82. That
> is "warmer" than fluorescents (and zero flicker!), and much warmer than a
> daylight bulb. Good for doing detailed work - which is exactly what we need
> there - and acceptable for working with colors.
>
> If we want mood lighting, we should get mood lighting. If we want lights
> to do soldering or other precision work, 4000K is great. Heck get both, so
> people can pick and choose what they need at any time. Plus a few >5000K,
> >90CRI daylight bulbs for people doing artwork.
>
> Patrik
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Cere Misc <cere.misc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As another point of reference for the lights that Patrik got for the lab
> room.  They are ugly cold sanitarium colored lights.  Please lets NOT get
> more of those!
> >
> >
> >On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Patrik D'haeseleer <patrikd at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >As another point of comparison, the LED light fixture I put in the CCL
> lab room is this one:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://www.homedepot.com/p/Lithonia-Lighting-2-ft-x-4-ft-White-LED-Prismatic-Lens-Troffer-2GTL4/203820958?N=5yc1vZc7buZ1z115g2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>It's a 4000 Lumens, 45 Watt fixture made to resemble a fluorescent tube
> one. Internally, it has four 36-LED strips behind a nice diffuser, and a
> big-ass 30VDC/1.58A LED driver. (In comparison, that first bulb Jake posted
> is 800 Lumen, so this one is equivalent in light output to about five of
> those)
> >>
> >>
> >>These sell for $119 at Home Depot, which is of course far too much.
> Should be easy to reverse engineer these for far less, but I'm not sure how
> well that would go over with our fire inspection, even if some of the
> chinese knockoffs may very well pose more of fire hazard...
> >>
> >>
> >>Patrik
> >>
> >>
> >>On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>so i guess sudoroom (and CCL too probably) need some new lights, since
> the flourescents are failing.
> >>>
> >>>Home Despot sells 11-watt "warm white" bulbs for $9 each, which would
> be a good idea if we had regular lamp sockets to screw bulbs into...
> >>>
> http://www.homedepot.com/p/Cree-60W-Equivalent-Daylight-5000K-A19-Dimmable-LED-Light-Bulb-with-4Flow-Filament-Design-BA19-08050OMF-12DE26-3U100/205597079?N=5yc1vZbm79
> >>>
> >>>but china can always do better.  I looked on Ali Express and sorted by
> customer satisfaction, looking for LED lighting in "downlights" which
> suggests lamps shining downward?
> >>>
> >>>these look good but the seller rating is only 97.4%:
> >>>
> http://www.aliexpress.com/item/High-Quality-Aluminum-9W-15W-21W-27W-45W-LED-Downlight-Ceiling-lights-lamp-AC85-265V-With/2027740342.html
> >>>
> >>>they seem to be "16 to 21" watts for $6.95 including shipping.  They
> offer "warm" and "cold" flavors so we could just get a mix of the two
> kinds, for something in the middle when they're all on.
> >>>
> >>>here is the search i was doing:
> >>>
> >>>
> http://www.aliexpress.com/category/200002289/led-downlights.html?site=glo&isrefine=y&shipCountry=US&SortType=total_weight_score_desc
> >>>
> >>>this one is also a good price, and the seller rating is higher (98.1%)
> >>>
> http://www.aliexpress.com/item/21W-Antifogging-Epistar-led-downlight-AC85-265V-Contains-the-drive-power-free-shipping/2047334906.html
> >>>
> >>>ultimately i have higher confidence in the quality of something we buy
> from Cree at Home Despot, but I think we should give China a chance and buy
> a few of the "16 to 21 watt" ones and see how they compare.
> >>>
> >>>For reference, Cree (a reputable company) and other LED bulbs sold at
> Home Despot are called "60 watt replacement" bulbs while actually using 9
> to 11 watts.  The light fixtures presently in Sudoroom and CCL each have
> two 75-watt flourescent bulbs, for a total of 900 watts of light in the
> bocce ball room when they're all working.
> >>>
> >>>That suggests that 150 watts of LED lighting would be equivalent, which
> would cost about $60 from the first aliexpress link i provided.
> >>>
> >>>These lights just have wires coming out, so we would perhaps attach
> them onto the metal structures that are presently holding flourescent
> lights for simplicity, until we come up with something better.
> >>>
> >>>-jake
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>sudo-discuss mailing list
> >>>sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> >>>https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >>>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>sudo-discuss mailing list
> >>sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> >>https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150219/aff87fb2/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:53:13 -0800
> From: "Patrik D'haeseleer" <patrikd at gmail.com>
> To: Jake <jake at spaz.org>
> Cc: "Dana S." <dsniezko at sonic.net>, sudo-discuss
>         <sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: Re: [sudo-discuss] lighting options
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAKOjizMjVMsbpbDJJ_NJi2oFYp71vLAhAxbWUAOjhUj_YvXE+A at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
>
> > The light fixtures presently in Sudoroom and CCL each have two 75-watt
> > flourescent bulbs, for a total of 900 watts of light in the bocce ball
> room
> > when they're all working.
> >
> > That suggests that 150 watts of LED lighting would be equivalent, which
> > would cost about $60 from the first aliexpress link i provided.
> >
>
> The 8ft 75W T12 fluorescent bulbs should be around 5000 Lumen each. The
> 7-LED bulbs you linked to are listed as 2100 Lumen, so 5 of those per
> fluorescent fixture should be enough to give the same illumination. The
> light will be a lot less diffuse though - one reason to perhaps experiment
> with LED strip lights instead...
>
> Patrik
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150219/6d6310cd/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:34:42 -0800
> From: Cere Misc <cere.misc at gmail.com>
> To: Glenn Meader <glenn at chromakinetics.com>
> Cc: Jake <jake at spaz.org>, "Dana S." <dsniezko at sonic.net>, sudo-discuss
>         <sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: Re: [sudo-discuss] lighting options
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAKtSE-uXzLv7uGuh88zzOA1NiXygtkmzhfOzKgyy-bEFDJenew at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Actually my favorite "warm" lighting is halogens.  Didn't bother to look at
> the specs but that combined with a little more whitish light would probably
> be ideal for sudo/ccl.  Again.  I think the light would be a lot more
> pleasant, whatever we choose, if it's projected to the ceiling and bouncing
> back down.
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Glenn Meader <glenn at chromakinetics.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Cere probably is thinking of the warmth of standard incandescent
> > lights with a color temp of 2700K.
> > A light with 4000K color temperature is a cool white, good for detail
> > work, not so nice for comfort...
> > For more info on color temperature in lighting for the layman:
> > http://www.topbulb.com/color-temperature/
> > -- Glenn (theater lighting designer)
> >
> >
> >   On Monday, February 16, 2015 12:49 AM, Patrik D'haeseleer <
> > patrikd at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The one in the lab room is 4000K, with a Color Rendering Index of 82.
> That
> > is "warmer" than fluorescents (and zero flicker!), and much warmer than a
> > daylight bulb. Good for doing detailed work - which is exactly what we
> need
> > there - and acceptable for working with colors.
> >
> > If we want mood lighting, we should get mood lighting. If we want lights
> > to do soldering or other precision work, 4000K is great. Heck get both,
> so
> > people can pick and choose what they need at any time. Plus a few >5000K,
> > >90CRI daylight bulbs for people doing artwork.
> >
> > Patrik
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Cere Misc <cere.misc at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > As another point of reference for the lights that Patrik got for the lab
> > room.  They are ugly cold sanitarium colored lights.  Please lets NOT get
> > more of those!
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Patrik D'haeseleer <patrikd at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > As another point of comparison, the LED light fixture I put in the CCL
> lab
> > room is this one:
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.homedepot.com/p/Lithonia-Lighting-2-ft-x-4-ft-White-LED-Prismatic-Lens-Troffer-2GTL4/203820958?N=5yc1vZc7buZ1z115g2
> >
> > It's a 4000 Lumens, 45 Watt fixture made to resemble a fluorescent tube
> > one. Internally, it has four 36-LED strips behind a nice diffuser, and a
> > big-ass 30VDC/1.58A LED driver. (In comparison, that first bulb Jake
> posted
> > is 800 Lumen, so this one is equivalent in light output to about five of
> > those)
> >
> > These sell for $119 at Home Depot, which is of course far too much.
> Should
> > be easy to reverse engineer these for far less, but I'm not sure how well
> > that would go over with our fire inspection, even if some of the chinese
> > knockoffs may very well pose more of fire hazard...
> >
> > Patrik
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
> >
> > so i guess sudoroom (and CCL too probably) need some new lights, since
> the
> > flourescents are failing.
> >
> > Home Despot sells 11-watt "warm white" bulbs for $9 each, which would be
> a
> > good idea if we had regular lamp sockets to screw bulbs into...
> > http://www.homedepot.com/p/Cree-60W-Equivalent-Daylight-
> > 5000K-A19-Dimmable-LED-Light-Bulb-with-4Flow-Filament-
> > Design-BA19-08050OMF-12DE26-3U100/205597079?N=5yc1vZbm79
> >
> > but china can always do better.  I looked on Ali Express and sorted by
> > customer satisfaction, looking for LED lighting in "downlights" which
> > suggests lamps shining downward?
> >
> > these look good but the seller rating is only 97.4%:
> > http://www.aliexpress.com/item/High-Quality-Aluminum-9W-
> > 15W-21W-27W-45W-LED-Downlight-Ceiling-lights-lamp-AC85-265V-
> > With/2027740342.html
> >
> > they seem to be "16 to 21" watts for $6.95 including shipping.  They
> offer
> > "warm" and "cold" flavors so we could just get a mix of the two kinds,
> for
> > something in the middle when they're all on.
> >
> > here is the search i was doing:
> >
> >
> http://www.aliexpress.com/category/200002289/led-downlights.html?site=glo&
> > isrefine=y&shipCountry=US&SortType=total_weight_score_desc
> >
> > this one is also a good price, and the seller rating is higher (98.1%)
> > http://www.aliexpress.com/item/21W-Antifogging-Epistar-
> > led-downlight-AC85-265V-Contains-the-drive-power-free-
> > shipping/2047334906.html
> >
> > ultimately i have higher confidence in the quality of something we buy
> > from Cree at Home Despot, but I think we should give China a chance and
> buy
> > a few of the "16 to 21 watt" ones and see how they compare.
> >
> > For reference, Cree (a reputable company) and other LED bulbs sold at
> Home
> > Despot are called "60 watt replacement" bulbs while actually using 9 to
> 11
> > watts.  The light fixtures presently in Sudoroom and CCL each have two
> > 75-watt flourescent bulbs, for a total of 900 watts of light in the bocce
> > ball room when they're all working.
> >
> > That suggests that 150 watts of LED lighting would be equivalent, which
> > would cost about $60 from the first aliexpress link i provided.
> >
> > These lights just have wires coming out, so we would perhaps attach them
> > onto the metal structures that are presently holding flourescent lights
> for
> > simplicity, until we come up with something better.
> >
> > -jake
> > _______________________________________________
> > sudo-discuss mailing list
> > sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> > https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sudo-discuss mailing list
> > sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> > https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sudo-discuss mailing list
> > sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> > https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150219/ed16aa92/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:38:40 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jake <jake at spaz.org>
> To: Cere Misc <cere.misc at gmail.com>
> Cc: Glenn Meader <glenn at chromakinetics.com>, "Dana S."
>         <dsniezko at sonic.net>, sudo-discuss <
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
> Subject: Re: [sudo-discuss] lighting options
> Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1502191938110.62936 at pe2950.spaz.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> halogens are very inefficient, 2nd only to plain old ordinary bulbs.
>
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Cere Misc wrote:
>
> > Actually my favorite "warm" lighting is halogens.? Didn't bother to look
> at the specs but that combined with a
> > little more whitish light would probably be ideal for sudo/ccl.? Again.?
> I think the light would be a lot more
> > pleasant, whatever we choose, if it's projected to the ceiling and
> bouncing back down.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Glenn Meader <glenn at chromakinetics.com>
> wrote:
> >       Cere probably is thinking of the warmth of standard incandescent
> lights?with a color temp
> >       of?2700K.?
> > A light with 4000K color temperature is a cool white, good for detail
> work, not so nice for comfort...
> > For more info on color temperature in lighting for the?layman:
> http://www.topbulb.com/color-temperature/
> > -- Glenn (theater lighting designer)
> >
> >
> > On Monday, February 16, 2015 12:49 AM, Patrik D'haeseleer <
> patrikd at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The one in the lab room is 4000K, with a Color Rendering Index of 82.
> That is "warmer" than fluorescents
> > (and zero flicker!), and much warmer than a daylight bulb. Good for
> doing detailed work - which is
> > exactly what we need there - and acceptable for working with colors.
> > If we want mood lighting, we should get mood lighting. If we want lights
> to do soldering or other
> > precision work, 4000K is great. Heck get both, so people can pick and
> choose what they need at any time.
> > Plus a few >5000K, >90CRI daylight bulbs for people doing artwork.
> >
> > Patrik
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Cere Misc <cere.misc at gmail.com> wrote:
> >       As another point of reference for the lights that Patrik got for
> the lab room.? They are
> >       ugly cold sanitarium colored lights.? Please lets NOT get more of
> those!
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Patrik D'haeseleer <patrikd at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >       As another point of comparison, the LED light fixture I put in the
> CCL lab room is
> >       this one:
> >
> http://www.homedepot.com/p/Lithonia-Lighting-2-ft-x-4-ft-White-LED-Prismatic-Lens-Troffer-2GTL4/203820958?N=5
> > yc1vZc7buZ1z115g2
> >
> > It's a 4000 Lumens, 45 Watt fixture made to resemble a fluorescent tube
> one. Internally, it
> > has four 36-LED strips behind a nice diffuser, and a big-ass 30VDC/1.58A
> LED driver. (In
> > comparison, that first bulb Jake posted is 800 Lumen, so this one is
> equivalent in light
> > output to about five of those)
> >
> > These sell for $119 at Home Depot, which is of course far too much.
> Should be easy to
> > reverse engineer these for far less, but I'm not sure how well that
> would go over with our
> > fire inspection, even if some of the chinese knockoffs may very well
> pose more of fire
> > hazard...
> >
> > Patrik
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
> >       so i guess sudoroom (and CCL too probably) need some new lights,
> since the
> >       flourescents are failing.
> >
> >       Home Despot sells 11-watt "warm white" bulbs for $9 each, which
> would be a good
> >       idea if we had regular lamp sockets to screw bulbs into...
> >
> http://www.homedepot.com/p/Cree-60W-Equivalent-Daylight-5000K-A19-Dimmable-LED-Light-Bulb-with-4Flow-Filament
> >       -Design-BA19-08050OMF-12DE26-3U100/205597079?N=5yc1vZbm79
> >
> >       but china can always do better.? I looked on Ali Express and
> sorted by customer
> >       satisfaction, looking for LED lighting in "downlights" which
> suggests lamps
> >       shining downward?
> >
> >       these look good but the seller rating is only 97.4%:
> >
> http://www.aliexpress.com/item/High-Quality-Aluminum-9W-15W-21W-27W-45W-LED-Downlight-Ceiling-lights-lamp-AC8
> >       5-265V-With/2027740342.html
> >
> >       they seem to be "16 to 21" watts for $6.95 including shipping.?
> They offer
> >       "warm" and "cold" flavors so we could just get a mix of the two
> kinds, for
> >       something in the middle when they're all on.
> >
> >       here is the search i was doing:
> >
> >
> http://www.aliexpress.com/category/200002289/led-downlights.html?site=glo&isrefine=y&shipCountry=US&SortType=
> >       total_weight_score_desc
> >
> >       this one is also a good price, and the seller rating is higher
> (98.1%)
> >
> http://www.aliexpress.com/item/21W-Antifogging-Epistar-led-downlight-AC85-265V-Contains-the-drive-power-free-
> >       shipping/2047334906.html
> >
> >       ultimately i have higher confidence in the quality of something we
> buy from Cree
> >       at Home Despot, but I think we should give China a chance and buy
> a few of the
> >       "16 to 21 watt" ones and see how they compare.
> >
> >       For reference, Cree (a reputable company) and other LED bulbs sold
> at Home
> >       Despot are called "60 watt replacement" bulbs while actually using
> 9 to 11
> >       watts.? The light fixtures presently in Sudoroom and CCL each have
> two 75-watt
> >       flourescent bulbs, for a total of 900 watts of light in the bocce
> ball room when
> >       they're all working.
> >
> >       That suggests that 150 watts of LED lighting would be equivalent,
> which would
> >       cost about $60 from the first aliexpress link i provided.
> >
> >       These lights just have wires coming out, so we would perhaps
> attach them onto
> >       the metal structures that are presently holding flourescent lights
> for
> >       simplicity, until we come up with something better.
> >
> >       -jake
> >       _______________________________________________
> >       sudo-discuss mailing list
> >       sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> >       https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sudo-discuss mailing list
> > sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> > https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sudo-discuss mailing list
> > sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> > https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
>
> End of sudo-discuss Digest, Vol 28, Issue 19
> ********************************************
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150219/cd99d85f/attachment.html>


More information about the sudo-discuss mailing list