[sudo-discuss] [sudo-board] URGENT: help finish state taxes

[Jenny Ryan]

I can fill out the parts about fundraising, procure a copy of the
(Current?) lease, and proofread the final.

Thanks so much to all who are helping with this!! <3

Jenny
http://jennyryan.net
http://thepyre.org
http://thevirtualcampfire.org
http://technomadic.tumblr.com

`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
 "Technology is the campfire around which we tell our stories."
-Laurie Anderson

"Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining it."
 -Hannah Arendt

"To define is to kill. To suggest is to create."
-Stéphane Mallarmé
~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`

On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:19 PM, <hol at gaskill.com> wrote:

>  >Yes, I agree. We need not, and should not, submit our Articles of
> Association to the state. The 3500 refers to articles of
> incorporation.
>
> This has been the plan whenever we've discussed it.  The articles of *association* are for our use and are intended to be updated freely without any legal weight, just the weight of our belief in the system we are creating.
>
>
>
>
> On 2014-11-02 10:24, yar wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Julio Rios <julio.rios at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In theory, since the Articles of Association can change, and they are
> actually what govern sudo room, so it may be better not to submit them....
> Although the latest version should be on the wiki, I don't think this is
> relevant for the state and federal paperwork.
>
> Yes, I agree. We need not, and should not, submit our Articles of
> Association to the state. The 3500 refers to articles of
> incorporation. Most organizations don't have "articles of
> association". It's just a weird anarchist thing that we did over a
> year before we became any sort of legal entity. :)
>
> If it hasn't happened already, we should also gain consensus on the bylaws
> and articles [of incorporation] before submitting them. I believe Yar said
> we never submitted the bylaws because we never gained consensus. Is there
> an expedited process for getting a decision on this? In theory, this is due
> on Nov 7, although I've heard the penalties for delay are not severe.
>
> Consensus was never really the issue. Laziness was the issue. There
> were a number of Sudoroom meetings last year where consensus was clear
> about the direction we wanted to go, but it was just never
> implemented. If we can have something ready to read on Wednesday and
> mail on Thursday, that's icing on the cake, but I say just do what we
> need to do for now, including mailing it before Wednesday if need be.
> From what I understand, we'll have the chance to change things again
> when we do 501c3 so it's just an interim document.
> ______________________________
> _________________
> sudo-discuss mailing listsudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.orghttps://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> board at lists.sudoroom.org
> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/board
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20141102/3a9541ba/attachment.html>