[sudo-discuss] revolutionaries and the creation of new language
Anthony Di Franco
di.franco at gmail.com
Thu May 9 10:33:47 PDT 2013
More of the same fun in Orwell's Politics and the English Language.
http://wikilivres.ca/wiki/Politics_and_the_English_Language
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Hol Gaskill <hol at gaskill.com> wrote:
> I would've been tortured by 4th grade, and not just by my peers??? I am
> all for rejecting institutionally inserted newspeak. I really like
> buckminster fuller's way of doing it where he replaces a common name with a
> truly descriptive name. This causes the idea to sink in deeper but takes
> fucking forever - grasping for my operating manual here the first one i
> find is:
>
> This "sovereign" - meaning top-weapons enforced - "national" claim upon
> humans born in various lands leads to ever more severely specialized
> servitude and highly personalized identity classification
>
> not the best example...but here is a true gem: renewable energy = "vast
> amounts of income wealth as Sun radiation and Moon gravity to implement our
> forward success"
>
> taking control of the newspeak is great but for more effective
> communication prior to viral-level word distribution, people have to
> understand the nature of the problem at hand in common terms repurposed to
> describe more accurately, maybe even be left to their own devices to
> collectively form their own newspeak to describe things that become
> commonly enough understood to require their own word? takes more work to
> lay the cultural substrate in my opinion, but seeing the existing coverage
> authoritarian substrate upon the lands i am 100% down with self-defensive
> newspeak. shall we brainstorm?
>
> suggested pattern: imposed newspeak -> actual description of thing ->
> alternate, more accurate newspeak
>
> clean coal = coal whose combustion byproducts are buried rather than
> vented to the atmosphere = drinkingwell coal (just getting warmed up, ok?)
>
> inflation = artificial human wealth reduction through repeated issuance of
> wealth credits to nonhuman entities at pre-issuance value, which
> equilibrate to reduced post-issuance value by the time they reach human
> hands = bankskimming
>
> war on terror = use of overwhelmingly disproportionate violence to respond
> to and/or preempt violence against the population funding it through direct
> action and fear-based behavior influence= state-sponsored terrorism
>
> lawn = high mowing/land/herbicide cost unproductive area maintained for
> solely aesthetic purposes = nongarden area
>
> taxes = violence-and/or-mobility restriction enforceable requirement to
> turn over a fraction of work benefit to multiple remote yet geographically
> encompassing organizations - each with their own overhead costs including
> physical structures, paper consumption, and advanced violence delivery
> personnel and equipment - for uses determined by arguments between
> strangers = well...taxes pretty much sums it up
>
> just my 0.0002 individual production credits
>
> May 9, 2013 12:52:40 AM, g2g-public01 at att.net wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> Romy, Yos-
> >
>
> >
> Good example. Also an example of what happens when power is wielded
> without checks & balances, by people who are so enamored of a
> theory that it obscures the real world.
> >
>
> >
> The Khmer Rough also routinely slaughtered or interned &
> tortured anyone found wearing glasses, because they believed that
> glasses were a sign of an attempt to assert status by the
> intellectual and technical classes. But the fact is that by middle
> age, almost all men and probably at least a majority of women
> require the use of glasses to read and perform other short-distance
> visual tasks. That inconvenient fact didn't get in the way of the
> Khmer Rouge's theory.
> >
>
> >
> Everyone reading this email is a member of the "intellectual and
> technical class," even if a large plurality of us are living on
> working class income or less. And the vast majority of us are going
> to live long enough to need glasses. Fortunately none of us has the
> power to compel any of us to use words a certain way, even though we
> can & do argue (as peers) about that.
> >
>
> >
> -G.
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
> =====
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
> On 13-05-08-Wed 10:21 PM, Romy Ilano
> wrote:
> >
>
>
> >
> There is a yin and a yang to everything.
>
> >
>
> Here are a few examples of the "dark side" of
> reshaping language... ;
>
> >
>
>
> >
> I've read a lot of history about the Chinese Cultural
> Revolution and the Cambodian Khmer Rouge... these groups
> were very interested in reforming a corrupt society, finding
> new ways of doing things. They are not shining examples but
> I can say that their intentions started out pure.
>
> >
>
>
> >
>
>
> >
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_Rouge_rule_of_Cambodia#Establishing_the_Constitution_of_Democratic_Kampuchea
> >
>
>
> >
>
>
> On
> the surface, society in Democratic Kampuchea was
> strictly ;egalitarian.
> The ;Khmer
> language, like many in Southeast Asia, has a complex
> system of usages to define speakers' rank and social
> status. These usages were abandoned. People were
> encouraged to call each other "friend", or "comrade" (in
> Khmer, មិត្ដ mitt), and to avoid traditional signs of
> deference such as bowing or folding the hands in
> salutation.
>
> Language
> was transformed in other ways. The Khmer Rouge invented
> new terms. People were told they must "forge" (lot dam)
> a new revolutionary character, that they were the
> "instruments" (opokar) of the Angkar, and that
> nostalgia for pre-revolutionary times (chheu satek arom,
> or "memory sickness") could result in their receiving
> Angkar's "invitation" to be deindustrialised and to live
> in a concentration camp.
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >sudo-discuss mailing list
> >sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> >http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20130509/787c2ba4/attachment.html>
More information about the sudo-discuss
mailing list