[sudo-discuss] Dystopia Watch: Surveillance drones coming to a cafe near you.

Tue Mar 5 11:19:04 PST 2013

If you knew the diaphragm size of the microphone in question, you'd be better off just emitting its resonant frequency.

On Mar 5, 2013, at 11:16 AM, rachel lyra hospodar <rachelyra at gmail.com> wrote:

> Wouldn't it need to be non-commercially available music, so they couldn't just find the audio data of the track, invert its wave, and cancel it out of the recording?
> 
> CACOPHONY FOR THE REVOLUTION!
> 
> mediumreality.com
> 
> On Mar 5, 2013 10:23 AM, "Steve Berl" <steveberl at gmail.com> wrote:
> You could carry a boombox around playing loud music where ever you go. Perhaps this would be the end of earbuds. :-)
> 
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Anthony Di Franco <di.franco at gmail.com> wrote:
> People have rendered surveillance cameras useless with very bright IR LEDs in their fields of view.
> Could something similar be done for sound recording devices?
> 
> On Mar 5, 2013 6:17 AM, "Anon195714" <anon195714 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> 
> Yo's-
> 
> Something I forgot to add re. DARPA's desire for universal recording of
> face-to-face conversations.
> 
> What's the ideal device for doing all that recording?
> 
> How'bout something you wear?  How'bout something that "everyone" wears?,
> or even a significant fraction of "everyone"?
> 
> Like maybe Google Glasses.
> 
> Always on, camera and mic always "connected" to "the cloud."  Orwell's
> telescreen gone mobile.
> 
> Everyone who wears them will become, in effect, _unpaid surveillance
> drones_ watching their family and friends, not from up in the sky, but
> from up close where every word can be heard.
> 
> Some will say "oh, there's no stopping technology." People said that
> about the atomic bomb and the hydrogen bomb.  But public outcry led
> first to treaties and then to progressive degrees of nuclear
> disarmament.  We haven't used that technology since it was first used in
> WW2.
> 
> We can stop pernicious tech if we choose.  We can refuse, we can
> withdraw consent, we do not have to press the Buy button.
> 
> Technology should liberate and empower people.  "Conveniences with a few
> strings attached" are not liberation, they're puppet-strings.
> 
> It's all about control: technology that you can control, vs. technology
> that can control you.
> 
> -G.
> 
> 
> =====
> 
> 
> On 13-03-05-Tue 1:50 AM, Anon195714 wrote:
> >
> > Yo's-
> >
> > This just in:
> >
> > "DARPA wants to make [voice recognition/transcription] systems so
> > accurate, you’ll be able to easily record, transcribe and recall all the
> > conversations you ever have. ... Imagine living in a world where every
> > errant utterance you make is preserved forever. ... DARPA [awarded
> > U.Texas comp sci researcher Matt Lease]... $300,000... over two years to
> > study the new project, called “Blending Crowdsourcing with Automation
> > for Fast, Cheap, and Accurate Analysis of Spontaneous Speech.”"
> >
> > "The idea is that business meetings or even conversations with your
> > friends and family could be stored in archives and easily searched. The
> > stored recordings could be held in servers, owned either by individuals
> > or their employers. ... The answer, Lease says, is in widespread use of
> > recording technologies like smartphones, cameras and audio recorders...
> > [A] memorandum from the Congressional Research Service described [an
> > earlier DARPA project of this type known as] EARS, as focusing on speech
> > picked up from broadcasts and telephone conversations, “as well as
> > extract clues about the identity of speakers” for “the military,
> > intelligence and law enforcement communities.”"
> >
> > http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/03/darpa-speech/ (Yes, "real geeks
> > don't read Wired," but nonetheless its news pages are useful for keeping
> > a finger on the pulse of Big Brother and his corporate Brethren.)
> >
> > In short:
> >
> > DARPA is researching the means by which every conversation you have,
> > in-person, whether at work or with family or friends, gets picked up by
> > the mic in your smartphone or other portable device, and stored on a
> > server, where DARPA's algorithms and human editors turn all of it into
> > fast-searchable text, that could be used by your employer, the military,
> > law enforcement, and intel agencies. Presumably the credit bureaus,
> > insurance companies, and financial institutions will want "in" on the
> > data as well.
> >
> > Now connect that with this, about cell-site tracking and call detail
> > records:
> >
> > "The government maintained [that] Americans have no expectation of
> > privacy of such cell-site records [call detail records or CDR] because
> > they are in the possession of a third party — the mobile phone companies."
> >
> > http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/gps-drug-dealer-retrial/
> >
> > The key point is that the gov's current position is that data stored on
> > a third party's servers have "no expectation of privacy." What begins
> > with CDR will eventually include voicemail messages stored on the mobile
> > phone companies' servers, and then eventually all of your live in-person
> > conversations that are stored "in the cloud."
> >
> > "Anything you say can and will be used against you..." Mark my words.
> >
> > Meanwhile people keep using gmail and Google Voice, and smartphones from
> > which they can't remove the batteries. Because nothing is more important
> > than "convenience," right?
> >
> > As a character in a sci-fi piece I wrote in the mid-1980s said, "Why put
> > a person in prison, when you can put prison in the person instead?"
> >
> > -G.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sudo-discuss mailing list
> > sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> > http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -steve 
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20130305/b864e5df/attachment.html>