[sudo-discuss] [omni-discuss] someone is stealing things at sudoroom / the omni

Sat Mar 28 18:10:54 PDT 2015

'

Is this Ian's phone chord? Nick has it here at the sudoroom now. I
remember it was a purple chord with tape. He claims it is his but I don't
trust him.

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:50 AM, johanna faust <female.faust at gmail.com>
wrote:

> just for the record:
>
> given that the thief is, as we have concluded, not reading this, hell NO
> do i think that solution ought be scrapped -- never did:
>
>
> *(short version)*
>
> "i suggest the solution be scrapped" was in light of the possibility of
> being 'overheard.'
>
> didn't know how to say that. i thought it was so good in fact that i
> wanted to get together in person forthwith to nab the fucker.
>
>
> *(long version)*
>
> given the notorious  properties of hindsight, i agree in advance that i
> may not have chosen the best approach but:
>
> "i suggest the solution be scrapped" was in light of the possibility of
> being 'overheard,' which it seems is agreed is 'not possible,' (and which i
> would agree would be unlikely in most places, but of which,* prior to
> this thread*,  i was more inclined to think some plausible possibility
> existed, in the Bay Area).
>
> however, given my premise, i had a problem: didn't know how to say that
> and not even further compromise an excellent idea. i thought it was so good
> in fact that i thought it was worthwhile to suggest such 'scrapping',
> wink, along with laudatory reference to the plan, (the which i thought left
> my 'wink' hopefully discernible), and get together in person forthwith to
> nab the fucker.
>
> thank you very much.  just saying.
>
> *sigh*
>
> ffaust
>
>
>
>
> *(long-ass post script in a smaller print to impart a paradoxicall
> flavour)*
>
> by way of *apologia, *a possibly (and hopefully) meta-recursive gloss of
> this author's motive in opting to post the above: i only just found out ten
> years ago that i am not exactly always the most concise, clear, direct
> and/or comprehend-able  with respect to my approach to communication,
> particularly if/when i think the situation calls for some form of
> preferentially targeted subtext (think shibboleth).
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:28 PM, <hol at gaskill.com> wrote:
>
>> i suggest the solution be scrapped
>>>
>>
>> like so many sweet sweet copper windings????
>>
>>
>> On 2015-03-26 19:53, johanna faust wrote:
>>
>>  that's a great idea! one problem: there is a chance the thief is reading
>>> this. i suggest the solution be scrapped, and best discussed at the next
>>> meeting, which i really want to be at, so if someone wants to give me a
>>> ride from downtown oakland in the event i am less than adequately mobile, i
>>> would gladly and quickly take them up on it.
>>>
>>> once again, thanks @Autonomous for the suggestion, and especially for
>>> the clear and comprehensive description & instructions thereof.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Autonomous <autonomous666 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Since the thief steals copper I suggest setting up a nicely presented
>>> coil of copper wires discretely connected to an Arduino board on digital
>>> pin 2 and ground, with pinMode() set to INPUT_PULLUP. When the copper has
>>> been removed it will open the switch triggering an interrupt function that
>>> will log the event as well as possibly activate other devices such as a
>>> loud alarm.
>>>
>>> Then what would you do after the thief is caught red-handed?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Cere Mona Davis <ceremona at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think that's a totally reasonable proposal.
>>>
>>> On Mar 26, 2015 4:02 PM, "niki" <niki.shelley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why can't the 48th St. doors be the primary access to Sudo / CCL when
>>> the bookstore is closed?
>>>
>>> Sudo / CCL & other member collective members still having full access to
>>> the building, of course, but not the general public as is currently the
>>> case.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:31 PM, <hol at gaskill.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> unless la commune maintains primary access to their space by passing
>>> through sudo room I'd say the 2 positions are consistent
>>>
>>> On 2015-03-26 14:52, niki wrote:
>>> I just want to mention that there was very, very, very strong objection
>>> from Sudo Room when La Commune wanted to lock up our space and, as a
>>> result, our space has remained open at all hours.
>>>
>>> Is this suggestion a reversal of that position?
>>>
>>> N
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:40 PM, johanna faust <female.faust at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> i agree. was hoping this wouldn't happen.
>>>
>>> sigh
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Rachel Wolfsohn <rawjnana at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> And I've thought this one through for a while, I'm not just thinking
>>> it's a good idea. It would narrow down suspects effectively, without losing
>>> our ability to share with the public, if done well
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Rachel Wolfsohn <rawjnana at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree. Locks on Sudo/CCL, all three doors, so that members can
>>> actually close up the equipment whether commons is open or closed!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Ryan <yandoryn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Or stealing my only cell phone charger _out of my backpack_.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
>>> the other day i noticed a bunch of copper wires I had near the robot
>>> were gone. I thought it was strange that they were all taken.
>>>
>>> today Rob mentioned that someone has taken all the copper windings off
>>> of his project. He also says that a week ago, his phone was stolen from
>>> where it was with his shirt, and his shirt was found outside.
>>>
>>> We all should have seen this coming but I really don't want this to keep
>>> happening. I think we might need to start thinking about locks on the
>>> sudoroom/CCL space, on all three doors connecting the room.
>>>
>>> when members close down the space they will be able to lock the doors
>>> and then we don't have to worry as much about people tearing apart our hard
>>> work so they can cash in copper to get a few bucks...
>>>
>>> -jake
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> discuss mailing list
>>> discuss at lists.omnicommons.org
>>> https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/discuss [1]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> discuss mailing list
>>> discuss at lists.omnicommons.org
>>> https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/discuss [1]
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150328/d6c8d1c8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ert.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 155340 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150328/d6c8d1c8/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: er.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 170025 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150328/d6c8d1c8/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: e.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 24193 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150328/d6c8d1c8/attachment-0002.jpg>