[sudo-discuss] [omni-discuss] Elliot Hughes

[David Keenan]

Hmm...

Then there was a second incident, because I did get confirmation that
Elliot 'walked out' a guy who jimmied open the door with a knife - I got
that confirmation from the person who was walked out and yelled at me about
it, so I'm pretty sure that happened..





On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:35 PM, niki <niki.shelley at gmail.com> wrote:

> I never heard about this incident.
>
> Can we create a place to report these kinds of things - maybe a separate
> list.
>
> I think it's important that the community is alerted when stuff like this
> happens.
>
> Did I miss something, maybe? Sorry!
>
> N
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Eske Silver <eske.silver at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Elliot was not involved in the incident where I interacted with the
>> intoxicated person who had a knife in the door, and was verbally abusive.
>> I enjoy the telephone game, same as anyone, but it seems this is one
>> story worthy of clarification.
>> The drunky, Pidgeon, Noah, one other sudoer, and I were there.
>>
>> ~ Korl
>>
>> 500px.com/eske
>> 510.689.4484
>> On Jan 16, 2015 4:59 PM, "Ryan" <yandoryn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sudo's meetings are at the same time, the same place, every week.
>>> Wednesday, 7 pm, Sudo Room.
>>>
>>> Matt just said that he's going to bring it up at the next meeting.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:55 PM, joseph liesner <blue393 at lmi.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> When I was corrected for calling Elliot my comrade I
>>>> thought well I don't know, yet, what happened with them
>>>> so sould I trust others (as I have been advised to in the past)
>>>> and no longer consider them a comrade.  It didn't feel right;
>>>> and I think that is why his banning feels so strange to me.
>>>> Then, finally, at post # 24 DK adds some important specifics.
>>>> So I am requesting that the Sudoroom meeting where Elliot' s
>>>> banning is discussed be announced on Discuss well in advance of
>>>> it's happening.
>>>> Tahnks
>>>> joe
>>>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 11:44 AM, Eske Silver wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sent this a couple days go, but I forgot to hit 'reply all':
>>>>
>>>> True, though, that we have parted ways with members, and guests, for
>>>> less than [multiple physical incidents?] - comrade or not.
>>>> While case-by-case is my prefered language, I also always stand by a
>>>> Zero Tolerance for abuse toward another loving being.
>>>>
>>>> From what I've read, this seems the logical mean answer:
>>>> For the sake of Safer Spaces, let's ask that Elliot appreciate a
>>>> request that they take leave, until we find a resolution...
>>>> For the sake of nuance and case-by-case, I'd bet we could find someone
>>>> who's known Elliot for a handful of human time increments, who would be so
>>>> kind as to reach out to Elliot. This person might then glean what's going
>>>> on with Elliot, and how he feels we (all) should/can procede with these
>>>> issues.
>>>> Then, for the sake of precident, if Elliot is willing and able, we can
>>>> follow the guide and set on to conflict resolution...
>>>> The rest is (in theory) easy, I'd say.
>>>>
>>>> Any edits?
>>>>
>>>> ~ Korl
>>>>
>>>> ~ Korl
>>>>
>>>> 500px.com/eske
>>>> 510.689.4484
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>>>> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at lists.omnicommons.org
>> https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.omnicommons.org
> https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150117/dfd5335c/attachment.html>