[sudo-discuss] Gittip spinoff seeks advice on democratic governance & bylaws for web applications

[Sonja Trauss]

I participate in the part of the community called "the mailing list."

I never comment on the threads about sudo room mechanics - I chat on
threads about general interest topics - porn, gentrification, now this
mysterious line in the gittip email.

I don't think the analogy is sound. What rabbit was talking about was "what
if the users of task rabbit owned it," yes, sounds good.
Now I know there are lots of people who have signed up for task rabbit, but
never got around to using it. They have a log in, they forget what it is.
Those people sound "not very invested in the project." My question is, why
would you need their input? They never log onto your site. Or take a less
extreme case. Someone who uses the site, even regularly, but is "not very
invested in the project." This person doesn't actually care what happens to
the site, they has some other site they also uses, or they is about to move
away so they doesn't care... Why do you need this person's input?

On Sunday, July 27, 2014, Jenny Ryan <tunabananas at gmail.com> wrote:

> I might ask the same of you, Sonja, wrt why sudo's mailing list would need
> input from people who don't really participate in our community?
>
>
>  On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Sonja Trauss <sonja.trauss at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sonja.trauss at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Why would you need input from people who aren't very invested in the
>> project?
>>
>> On Friday, July 25, 2014, Rabbit <rabbitface at gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','rabbitface at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all!
>>>
>>> Recently there was a controversy at Gittip which resulted in a project
>>> to fork or rebuilding it with better governance structures and more focus
>>> on the needs and safety of marginalized users.
>>>
>>> They are figuring out how to run a web application in a cooperative
>>> democratic way that focuses on the needs of the users, as opposed to a
>>> TaskRabbit like model where a central corporation controls or extracts
>>> value from their users and makes unilateral decisions.
>>>
>>> They're working on bylaws and legal structures for this, and would
>>> appreciate advice or connections to people with advice.  Talk to them in
>>> IRC at #atunit, particularly @adrienneleigh, or send me resources to pass
>>> along.
>>>
>>> This is an exciting frontier for the cooperative movement.  What if
>>> TaskRabbit was owned by the rabbits?  Websites have very concentrated power
>>> structures compared to the number of users; what are effective ways to get
>>> input from so many people who might not all be very invested in the
>>> project?  What other models can we draw from -- credit unions?  What
>>> lessons can be learned from Wikipedia?  Etc.
>>>
>>> This especially matters for this particular use case, recurring
>>> donations, because some people will be making their living off of proceeds
>>> from the site and it's important that their voice is heard.
>>>
>>> Sudoroom may be one of the largest users of this site when it launches,
>>> like we are now with Gittip.
>>>
>>> -Rabbit
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org');>
>> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20140727/918dba4b/attachment.html>