[sudo-discuss] [OMNI] Proposals up for consensus:

[hol at gaskill.com]

i personally wouldn't block this, but i think if we move toward a 2/3
majority, the larger collectives should get additional delegates. 

also - has jesse provided an invoice for his work so far? seems like we
should see the invoice before agreeing to pay, as a matter of
professional services protocol and recordkeeping. 

On 2014-07-22 05:12, Marc Juul wrote: 

> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Jenny Ryan <tunabananas at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Jenny! 
> 
>> 3. Revision to Consensus Process:
>> Thus far, the Omni Collective has made decisions using a full
>> consensus model. The proposal on the table is for votes to strive for
>> full consensus, but resort to a 2/3 majority vote if consensus cannot
>> be achieved. This model was recommended by Jesse, who has extensive
>> experience representing coops and collectives who've run into problems
>> with full-consensus models for hairy decisions like banning an abusive
>> individual or - as may be the case with us - removing particular
>> groups/collectives from the larger collective.
> 
> I am blocking this one. We can implement different voting models for specific types of decisions similar to what sudo has. Revoking consensus completely is a lazy solution (and yes, this suggestion is equivalent to revoking consensus as the decision-making process).
> 
> -- 
> marc/juul 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss [1]
 

Links:
------
[1] https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20140722/ce9152bd/attachment.html>