[sudo-discuss] [consensus] Nominations for Board of Directors

[Kerrie O]

I don't know if I'm obliged to reply to the entire list with this, but I
respectfully decline the nomination. <<;


On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Eddan Katz <eddan at clear.net> wrote:

> I'd like to help out with this research - to compare and contrast the
> different insurance agreements, in regards to terms and conditions.
>
> A sample of groups that include heavy machinery, bio-hacking, kids
> programs, and eCommerce (products & services) would be the ideal for the
> essential stuff we'd need to worry about.
>
> It would be very useful to do some kind of mash-up overlapping this
> comparative chart with the ongoing Oakland zoning conditions research. I
> know there have been various efforts - does anyone have a sense of where to
> find this information?
>
>
> sent from eddan.com
>
> On Oct 26, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Marc Juul <juul at labitat.dk> wrote:
>
> To those of you wondering how much liability you'd be taking on, here's a
> short summary:
>
>
> http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/nonprofit-directors-personal-liability-32357.html
>
> This assumes that sudo room has liability insurance, which should be top
> priority as soon we are incorporated (getting liability was a primary
> motivator for becoming incorporated in the first place.
>
> Who wants to take on the task of researching hacker space liability
> insurance? I suggested contacting a few other California hackerspaces and
> asking about their insurance policy and pricing and bringing that info to
> the upcoming weekly meeting.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:24 AM, David Keenan <dkeenan44 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I missed this meeting and most sudo general due to a public school class
>> at the same time.. not sure if this disqualifies me from weighing in, or if
>> some i nominate have perhaps already precluded/disinclined themselves from
>> being nominated, but i thought I would add my 2c here, (which y'all are
>> also free to totally disregard if course if needs be) -
>>
>> Marc (marcjc)
>> Matt (mattsenate)
>> Jenny (tunabananas)
>> Jordan (yardena)
>> Marina (mk30)
>> J.C. (r33lmm)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, October 24, 2013, Max Klein wrote:
>>
>>> Eddan, that is flattering, I accept nomination.
>>>
>>> notconfusing
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24 October 2013 15:18, Eddan Katz <eddan at clear.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not sure whether or not it's necessary under the process Yardena
>>>> described, but I second Max's nominations for the Board.
>>>>
>>>> I also hereby nominate Max (notconfusing) for the Board as well.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a particular number we're shooting for in terms of the Board?
>>>>
>>>> For reference on what a non-profit Board does (assuming an active
>>>> board, which I understand currently is not what we want) - the Nolo Press
>>>> page at
>>>> http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/building-nonprofits-board-30046.htmlis useful, I think.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> sent from eddan.com
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 24, 2013, at 7:56 AM, Max Klein <isalix at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I Max (notconfusing), nominate Jordan (yardena), Marina (mk30), Vicky
>>>> (ykciv), Liberty (thattechgirl), Kare (kkr), and Jenny (tunabananas) for
>>>> board membership.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23 October 2013 21:05, Yardena Cohen <yardenack at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> At tonight's meeting there was consensus that we should move forward
>>>>> with these articles as they are. So for our purposes right now, they
>>>>> are officially ratified:
>>>>> https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Articles_of_Incorporation
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, this entails a Board of Directors. So far no viable
>>>>> legal hacks have appeared to work around this. So the next detail we
>>>>> need to tackle is exactly WHO will be on this Board. We decided that
>>>>> the most legitimate way to do this is to let the mailing list nominate
>>>>> names to a list, confirm they are willing, and then consent on the
>>>>> list of names, to address any potential disagreements or conflicts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please use this thread to nominate yourselves or others to be on our
>>>>> Board of Directors. Remember, this position requires your name on
>>>>> official government paperwork, will come with legal liability, and
>>>>> will be constructed with as little actual power as possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully this will be settled by next week's meeting (Oct 30), at
>>>>> which point we can actually drive to Sacramento and file!
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>>>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>>>>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>>>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20131026/affb4c45/attachment.html>